AIPNO Abstract Guidelines
Please submit an abstract that encompasses one of the following areas:
-
Clinical Research- Health/Medical research
-
Quality Improvement/Performance Improvement
-
Basic Sciences
Word limit-250 words. Abstract Submission deadline extended till September 21st, 2025
Scholar Poster Presentation
All disciplines and level of trainees are encouraged [e.g., students, residents, fellow, nursing, pharmacy, social work, medicine investigators]. A visual e-poster presentation is required to gain the opportunity for interaction and feedback.
Review Process
Following submission, a panel of interdisciplinary, experienced educators will review the abstracts.
Poster registered presenters will receive a dedicated link to upload their E-Posters.
Please submit your E-Poster as a 1-page in portrait orientation.
-
Language: All E-Posters should be prepared in English.
-
File format: PDF only
-
E-Poster size in pixel: 1080 width x 1536 height - portrait orientation
-
E-Poster size in cm: 38'1 width x 54'2 height - portrait orientation
-
Font size: ≥16
Scientific posters should follow the IMRAD format (Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion).
-
The Introduction presents the background and purpose of the research. The background information typically consists of a statement summarizing the current knowledge in an area, what knowledge is missing, and how this research project addresses the knowledge gap. A hypothesis can be included in the Introduction.
-
The Methods section should specifically address the following areas: research design, research setting, number of patients enrolled in the study, and how they were selected. The Methods section should also include a description of the intervention (if appropriate), a description of the outcome variables and how they were measured, and the method of statistical analysis.
-
The Results section includes the quantitative data. This section usually begins with a description of the subjects in the study and a description of those who were not included because they failed to meet the inclusion criteria or dropped out. Include the frequencies of the most important outcome variables. Consider comparisons of the outcome variables between various subgroups within the study (treated vs. untreated, young vs. old, male vs. female, and so forth). Numerical results should include standard deviations or 95% confidence limits and the level of statistical significance should be indicated.
-
Finally, in the Discussion section, state concisely what can be concluded from the study and its implications. Make sure that the conclusions are supported by the data presented in the Results and do not present unsubstantiated personal opinion
Note: Please create login once to proceed for abstract submission for poster presentation
